<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 2.0 Riptide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ovcblog.wordpress.com/2008/03/26/the-20-riptide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ovcblog.wordpress.com/2008/03/26/the-20-riptide/</link>
	<description>Kaizen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:17:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ovcblog</title>
		<link>http://ovcblog.wordpress.com/2008/03/26/the-20-riptide/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>ovcblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 00:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ovcblog.wordpress.com/?p=51#comment-45</guid>
		<description>@techchick94
You are absolutely correct.  That is how you said it and that is what I meant as well.  I did not type it correctly.

Thanks for you comments.  I have enjoyed your podcasts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@techchick94<br />
You are absolutely correct.  That is how you said it and that is what I meant as well.  I did not type it correctly.</p>
<p>Thanks for you comments.  I have enjoyed your podcasts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: techchick94</title>
		<link>http://ovcblog.wordpress.com/2008/03/26/the-20-riptide/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>techchick94</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 22:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ovcblog.wordpress.com/?p=51#comment-44</guid>
		<description>I love the poster you created--great visual to get teachers thinking. 

I did want to make one clarification--you mentioned a quote from our podcast about technology being integrated not integral. I think we said it the other way around (and if we didn&#039;t, we sure meant to!). What we were trying to say is that for years, we&#039;ve told teachers to integrate technology--add it to what they were doing to enhance instruction. But now, technology is ubiquitous-an accepted and oft times crucial presence in so much of what we do. So it can no longer be integrated, but instead must be integral--just a seamless part of everything we do with kids--another tool, but one that can&#039;t be separated out. It&#039;s an essential piece that completes the picture of what students should be doing in the classroom because it is such a big part of not just their lives, but the world we live in. 

Thanks for listening and for your thoughtful post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the poster you created&#8211;great visual to get teachers thinking. </p>
<p>I did want to make one clarification&#8211;you mentioned a quote from our podcast about technology being integrated not integral. I think we said it the other way around (and if we didn&#8217;t, we sure meant to!). What we were trying to say is that for years, we&#8217;ve told teachers to integrate technology&#8211;add it to what they were doing to enhance instruction. But now, technology is ubiquitous-an accepted and oft times crucial presence in so much of what we do. So it can no longer be integrated, but instead must be integral&#8211;just a seamless part of everything we do with kids&#8211;another tool, but one that can&#8217;t be separated out. It&#8217;s an essential piece that completes the picture of what students should be doing in the classroom because it is such a big part of not just their lives, but the world we live in. </p>
<p>Thanks for listening and for your thoughtful post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
